Copying completions from another command

If you want a command, say cmd1, to have the same completions as another, say cmd2, which has already had
completions defined for it, you can do this:

This can be useful for example if you have created an alias for a command to help you remember it.

A good way to get started is to look at some already defined completion functions.
On my linux installation these are found in /usr/share/zsh/functions/Completion/Unix
and /usr/share/zsh/functions/Completion/Linux and a few other subdirs.

You will notice that the _arguments function is used a lot in these files.
This is a utility function that makes it easy to write simple completion functions.
The _arguments function is a wrapper around the compadd builtin function.
The compadd builtin is the core function used to add completion words to the command line, and control its behaviour.
However, most of the time you will not need to use compadd, since there are many utility functions such as _arguments
and _describe which are easier to use.

For very basic completions the _describe function should be adequate

Utility functions

Here is a list of some of the utility functions that may be of use.
The full list of utility functions, with full explanations, is available here.
Examples of how to use these functions are given in the next section.

main utility functions for overall completion

functions for performing complex completions of single words

functions for completing specific types of objects

functions for handling cached completions

If you have a very large number of completions you can save them in a cache file so that the completions load quickly.

other functions

Actions

Many of the utility functions such as _arguments, _regex_arguments, _alternative and _values may include an action
at the end of an option/argument specification. This action indicates how to complete the corresponding argument.
The actions can take one of the following forms:

Not all action types are available for all utility functions that use them. For example the ->STRING type is not available in the
_regex_arguments or _alternative functions.

Writing simple completion functions using _describe

The _describe function can be used for simple completions where the order and position of the options/arguments is
not important. You just need to create an array parameter to hold the options & their descriptions, and then pass
the parameter name as an argument to _describe. The following example creates completion candidates c and d, with
the descriptions (note this should be put in a file called _cmd in some directory listed in $fpath).

#compdef cmd
local -a subcmds
subcmds=('c:description for c command' 'd:description for d command')
_describe 'command' subcmds

You can use several different lists separated by a double hyphen as follows but note that this mixes the matches under and single heading and is not intended to be used with different types of completion candidates:

local -a subcmds topics
subcmds=('c:description for c command' 'd:description for d command')
topics=('e:description for e help topic' 'f:description for f help topic')
_describe 'command' subcmds -- topics

If two candidates have the same description, _describe collects them together on the same row and ensures that descriptions are aligned in neatly in columns.
The _describe function can be used in an ACTION as part of a specification for _alternative, _arguments or _regex_arguments.
In this case you will have to put it in braces with its arguments, e.g. ‘TAG:DESCRIPTION:{_describe ‘values’ options}’

Writing completion functions using _alternative

Like _describe, this function performs simple completions where the order and position of options/arguments is not important.
However, unlike _describe, instead of fixed matches further functions may be called to generate the completion candidates. Furthermore, _alternative allows a mix of different types of completion candidates to be mixed.

As arguments it takes a list of specifications each in the form ‘TAG:DESCRIPTION:ACTION’ where TAG is a special tag that identifies the type of completion matches,
DESCRIPTION is used as a heading to describe the group of completion candidates collectively, and ACTION is one of the action types listed previously (apart from the ->STRING and =ACTION forms).
For example:

_alternative 'arguments:custom arg:(a b c)' 'files:filename:_files'

The first specification adds completion candidates a, b & c, and the second specification calls the _files function for completing filepaths.

We could split the specifications over several lines with and add descriptions to each of the custom args like this:

_alternative 
  'args:custom arg:((a:"description a" b:"description b" c:"description c"))' 
  'files:filename:_files'

If we want to pass arguments to _files they can simply be included, like this:

_alternative 
  'args:custom arg:((a:"description a" b:"description b" c:"description c"))'
  'files:filename:_files -/'

To use parameter expansion to create our list of completions we must use double quotes to quote the specifications,
e.g:

_alternative 
  "dirs:user directory:($userdirs)" 
  "pids:process ID:($(ps -A o pid=))"

In this case the first specification adds the words stored in the $userdirs variable, and the second specification
evaluates ‘ps -A o pid=’ to get a list of pids to use as completion candidates. In practice, we would make used of the existing _pids function for this.

We can use other utility functions such as _values in the ACTION to perform more complex completions, e.g:

_alternative 
  "directories:user directory:($userdirs)" 
  'options:comma-separated opt: _values -s , letter a b c'

this will complete the items in $userdirs, as well as a comma separated list containing a, b &/or c. Note the use of the initial space before _values. This is needed because _values doesn’t understand standard compadd options for descriptions.

As with _describe, the _alternative function can itself be used in an ACTION as part of a specification for _arguments
or _regex_arguments.

Writing completion functions using _arguments

With a single call to the _arguments function you can create fairly sophisticated completion functions. It is intended to handle typical commands that take a variety of options along with some normal arguments.
Like the _alternative function, _arguments takes a list of specification strings as arguments.
These specification strings specify options and any corresponding option arguments (e.g. -f filename),
or command arguments.

Basic option specifications take the form ‘-OPT[DESCRIPTION]’, e.g. like this:

_arguments '-s[sort output]' '--l[long output]' '-l[long output]'

Arguments for the option can be specified after the option description in this form ‘-OPT[DESCRIPTION]:MESSAGE:ACTION’,
where MESSAGE is a message to display and ACTION can be any of the forms mentioned in the ACTIONS section above.
For example:

_arguments '-f[input file]:filename:_files' 

Command argument specifications take the form ‘N:MESSAGE:ACTION’ where N indicates that it is the Nth command argument,
and MESSAGE & ACTION are as before. If the N is omitted then it just means the next command argument (after any that have
already been specified). If a double colon is used at the start (after N) then the argument is optional.
For example:

_arguments '-s[sort output]' '1:first arg:_net_interfaces' '::optional arg:_files' ':next arg:(a b c)'

here the first arg is a network interface, the next optional arg is a file name, the last arg can be either a, b or c,
and the -s option may be completed at any position.

The _arguments function allows the full set of ACTION forms listed in the ACTION section above.
This means that you can use actions for selecting case statement branches like this:

In this case paths to music files are completed stepwise descending down directories using the _multi_parts function,
and the flags are completed as a comma separated list using the _values function.

I have just given you the basics of _arguments specifications here, you can also specify mutually exclusive options,
repeated options & arguments, options beginning with + instead of -, etc. For more details see the official documentation.
Also have a look at the tutorials mentioned at the end of this document, and the completion functions in the src directory.

Writing completion functions using _regex_arguments and _regex_words

If you have a complex command line specification with several different possible argument sequences then
the _regex_arguments function may be what you need. It typically works well where you have a series of keywords followed by a variable number of arguments.

_regex_arguments creates a completion function whose name is given by the first argument.
Hence you need to first call _regex_arguments to create the completion function, and then call that function,
e.g. like this:

_regex_arguments _cmd OTHER_ARGS..
_cmd "$@"

The OTHER_ARGS should be sequences of specifications for matching & completing words on the command line.
These sequences can be separated by ‘|’ to represent alternative sequences of words.
You can use bracketing to arbitrary depth to specify alternate subsequences, but the brackets must be backslashed like this ( )
or quoted like this ‘(’ ‘)’.

For example:

_regex_arguments _cmd SEQ1 '|' SEQ2 ( SEQ2a '|' SEQ2b )
_cmd "$@"

This specifies a command line matching either SEQ1, or SEQ2 followed by SEQ2a or SEQ2b. You are describing the form arguments to the command take in the form of a regular expression grammar.

Each specification in a sequence must contain a / PATTERN/ part at the start followed by an optional ‘:TAG:DESCRIPTION:ACTION’
part.

Each PATTERN is a regular expression to match a word on the command line. These patterns are processed sequentially
until we reach a pattern that doesn’t match at which point any corresponding ACTION is performed to obtain completions
for that word. Note that there needs to be a pattern to match the initial command itself.
See below for further explanation about PATTERNs.

The ‘:TAG:DESCRIPTION:ACTION’ part is interpreted in the same way as for the _alternative function specifications,
except that it has an extra : at the start, and now all of the possible ACTION formats listed previously are allowed.

Here is an example:

_regex_arguments _cmd /$'[^]##'/ ( /$'word1(a|b|c)'/ ':word:first word:(word1a word1b word1c)' '|'
   /$'word11(a|b|c)'/ ':word:first word:(word11a word11b word11c)' ( /$'word2(a|b|c)'/ ':word:second word:(word2a word2b word2c)'
   '|' /$'word22(a|b|c)'/ ':word:second word:(word22a word22b word22c)' ) )
_cmd "$@"

in this case the first word can be word1 or word11 followed by an a, b or c, and if the first word contains 11 then a second
word is allowed which can be word2 followed by and a, b, or c, or a filename.

If this sounds too complicated a much simpler alternative is to use the _regex_words function for creating
specifications for _regex_arguments.

Patterns

You may notice that the / PATTERN/ specs in the previous example don’t look like normal regular expressions.
Often a string parameter in the form $’foo’ is used. This is so that the in the string is interpreted correctly
as a null char which is used to separate words in the internal representation. If you don’t include the at the end
of the pattern you may get problems matching the next word. If you need to use the contents of a variable in a pattern,
you can double quote it so that it gets expanded and then put a string parameter containing a null char afterwards,
like this: “$somevar”$’’

The regular expression syntax for patterns seems to be a bit different from normal regular expressions,
and I can’t find documentation anywhere.
However I have managed to work out what the following special chars are for:

_regex_words

The _regex_words function makes it much easier to create specifications for _regex_arguments.
The results of calling _regex_words can be stored in a variable which can then be used instead
of a specification for _regex_arguments.

To create a specification using _regex_words you supply it with a tag followed by a description followed by a list
of specifications for individual words. These specifications take the form ‘WORD:DESCRIPTION:SPEC’ where WORD is the
word to be completed, DESCRIPTION is a description for it, and SPEC can be another variable created by _regex_words
specifying words that come after the current word or blank if there are no further words.
For example:

_regex_words firstword 'The first word' 'word1a:a word:' 'word1b:b word:' 'word1c:c word'

the results of this function call will be stored in the $reply array, and so we should store it in another array
before $reply gets changed again, like this:

local -a firstword
_regex_words word 'The first word' 'word1a:a word:' 'word1b:b word:' 'word1c:c word'
firstword="$reply[@]"

we could then use it with _regex_arguments like this:

_regex_arguments _cmd /$'[^]##'/ "$firstword[@]"
_cmd "$@"

Note that I have added an extra pattern for the initial command word itself.

Here is a more complex example where we call _regex_words for different words on the command line

local -a firstword firstword2 secondword secondword2
_regex_words word1 'The second word' 'woo:tang clan' 'hoo:not me'
secondword=("$reply[@]")
_regex_words word2 'Another second word' 'yee:thou' 'haa:very funny!'
secondword2=("$reply[@]")
_regex_words commands 'The first word' 'foo:do foo' 'man:yeah man' 'chu:at chu'
firstword=("$reply[@]")
_regex_words word4 'Another first word' 'boo:scare somebody:$secondword' 'ga:baby noise:$secondword'
 'loo:go to the toilet:$secondword2'
firstword2=("$reply[@]")

_regex_arguments _hello /$'[^]##'/ "${firstword[@]}" "${firstword2[@]}"
_hello "$@"

In this case the first word can be one of “foo”, “man”, “chu”, “boo”, “ga” or “loo”.
If the first word is “boo” or “ga” then the second word can be “woo” or “hoo”,
and if the first word is “loo” then the second word can be “yee” or “haa”, in the other
cases there is no second word.

For a good example of the usage of _regex_words have a look at the _ip function.

complex completions with _values, _sep_parts, & _multi_parts

The _values, _sep_parts & _multi_parts functions can be used either on their own, or as ACTIONs in specifications for
_alternative, _arguments or _regex_arguments. The following examples may be instructive.
See the official documentation for more info.

Space separated list of mp3 files:

_values 'mp3 files' ~/*.mp3

Comma separated list of session id numbers:

_values -s , 'session id' "${(uonzf)$(ps -A o sid=)}"

Completes foo@news:woo, or foo@news:laa, or bar@news:woo, etc:

_sep_parts '(foo bar)' @ '(news ftp)' : '(woo laa)'

Complete some MAC addresses one octet at a time:

_multi_parts : '(00:11:22:33:44:55 00:23:34:45:56:67 00:23:45:56:67:78)'

Adding completion words directly using compadd

For more fine grained control you can use the builtin compadd function to add completion words directly.
This function has many different options for controlling how completions are displayed and how text on the command line
can be altered when words are completed. Read the official documentation for full details.
Here I just give a few simple examples.

Add some words to the list of possible completions:

As above but also display an explanation:

compadd -X 'Some completions' foo bar blah

As above but automatically insert a prefix of “what_” before the completed word:

compadd -P what_ foo bar blah

As above but automatically insert a suffix of “_todo” after the completed word:

compadd -S _todo foo bar blah

As above but automatically remove the “_todo” suffix if a blank char is typed after the suffix:

compadd -P _todo -q foo bar blah

Add words in array $wordsarray to the list of possible completions

To reload a completion function: