The great VC pullback of 2022

The great VC pullback of 2022

These components are unbelievable.

Are we witnessing a major VC pullback? Is it temporary? What does that mean for startups? Certainly the topic du jour in startup circles.

Here’s what I’m seeing.


Yes. The market is a bit all over the place, not everyone fully agrees on what’s happening, and certainly a number of financings are still happening. But the pullback is real and already starting to show in the data (CBInsights Q1’22 report).

My sense is that the current reality of the market is a lot worse, because deal data is a trailing indicator – financings are often announced months after they closed.

Many deals today are not getting done.

As tends to be the case, the correction started happening in public markets (sometime in H2 2021), then propagated down to the private venture growth market (Q1 2022), then to the Series A/B stage (currently). Venture tends to work as an assembly line, with each investor depending on the next stage (either a next round of financing or a public company IPO exit) for their short term success. As the next stage becomes trickier, the natural inclination is to slow down activity to avoid having more investments slam into a wall. It takes a few months for that cycle to happen, and for a bear market to trickle down from post-IPO to seed.

In a lot of conversations with VC friends, I’m told people haven’t hardly made any net new investment in 2022. The growth market seems effectively dead right now. Tiger, after a very intense couple of years at the growth stage, seems to have moved overnight to seed/Series A. The two firms I’m seeing consistently active at the growth stage right now are Insight and Softbank.

Only two parts of the market have been spared so far:

seed: plenty of financings still happening at the seed level. No real compression on valuations yet. YC is as frothy as ever. Arguably, the seed stage should be the most recession-proof area of venture, because seed companies are 6-10 years away from a meaningful exit, and no one can predict where the market will be then. Also, checks are smaller, especially seen from the perspective of the very large multi-stage firms that have earmarked hundreds of millions of dollars to seed the seed stage.

Public tech stocks: 📉

Venture growth: dead

YC: sorry, it’s $20-$25M cap/valuation minimum for our 3-person, 9 month old startup

— Matt Turck (@mattturck) March 28, 2022

crypto: the web3 market largely follows its own logic. Many investments are token based, rather than equity based, so to some extent web3 companies a less immediately caught in the propagation logic mentioned above. Also, market traction can be somewhat circular and self-reinforcing in the web3 world, as companies and projects tend to be closely intertwined. Finally, after an explosion of crypto VC funds, there’s arguably a lot more money chasing deals, than truly exciting companies and projects just yet.

It also seems that the pullback is mostly a US phenomenon right now. From all my conversations with European friends, for example, things continue to be frothy over there. My sense is that the current US situation will propagate internationally sooner rather than later.

Wait, but haven’t VCs raised huge funds? Doesn’t that money need to go somewhere?

Yes, VCs have raised funds at an unprecedented pace in 2020-2021. And yes, with some nuances, there are economic incentives for them to deploy the funds (management fees on called capital, different variations there depending on LP agreements).

So, where is that money going to go?

First, and to rule it out (hopefully) – there’s a disaster scenario where the broad market enters into deep recession and LPs get out of / renege on commitments. Remember, when a VC fund closes a new fund, capital is not provided as of Day 1 but instead gets called from LPs over several years, as the fund makes investments.

Second, in a world where the next round doesn’t happen magically every few months, VCs are likely to need to use more capital to support their existing portfolio, as opposed to making net new investments. For the last couple of years, inside rounds had become a sign of strength as investors wanted to pile more money into winners. Expect a reversal to the historical norm where inside rounds are mostly used to support portfolio companies that are getting short on cash.

Third, the market is going to become ever more bifurcated than it’s been. For the last few years, it’s been tale of “haves and have nots”, where money tends to concentrate in comparatively fewer companies, the well-discussed “flight to quality”. This is only going to accelerate from here, with the companies perceived as “best” attracting the lion share of new capital. One rationale will be that, in a slowing market, those companies will have an opportunity to acquire weaker competitors and become industry consolidators.

Fourth, and perhaps most importantly, expect slower fund deployment times. The last couple of years have seen a lot of VCs raise a fund, promise their LPs a 2 or 3 deployment timeline, only to come back 18 months later raising a much bigger fund. As LP patience (and resources) got seriously tested, expect VCs to give their investor base a rest and deploy current funds at much slower pace.


I want to believe that there’s an optimistic version where this is a short term correction. It is somewhat ironic that many growth startups and public tech companies are crushing it in terms of overall business performance, but still getting hammered by investors.

Equally, there’s a little bit of “what goes up must come down” and we’re just coming out of one of the longest bull runs in history. Yes, software will continue to eat the world, but in the short term, our ecosystem of startups and venture capital is still a tiny part of the world economy. Macro changes like interest rate hikes move trillions of dollars, and we’re just a trickle in that overall flood.

One key condition to VC activity re-accelerating: the market needs to stabilize to a new normal.

No VC wants to do “a 2022 deal at a 2021 valuation”, but what is a 2022 deal exactly?

I’m a professional VC and I literally have no idea what a Series A (or B or C) valuation is right now. The market seems to be adjusting but it’s all over the place.

— Matt Turck (@mattturck) January 27, 2022

We’ve certainly come down from the 100x-200x ARR craziness but there’s still the odd financing round that gets done at those levels. Founder expectations are all over the place, with many still living in the 2020-2021 valuation world — for perfectly legitimate reasons since they generally only step a toe in the financing world every few months or years, as opposed to VCs who live in it every day. The general perception amongst VCs is that deals are still very expensive.

One variable that seems to be changing is round size expectations, perhaps as a precursor to lower valuations). From what I’m seeing, the inflation there has slowed down considerably. Over the last couple of years, Series A rounds had ballooned from $12M-$15M to $20M. It seems that the $20M Series A has largely disappeared, and I’m seeing asks back down to $10M-$15M.

R.I.P., $20M Series A as a market norm (2020-2022).

— Matt Turck (@mattturck) March 4, 2022


That’s the obvious question everyone is currently discussing.

The easy (to say) part: at a minimum, be increasingly careful with cash. A number of companies in the FirstMark portfolio have gone through reforecasting, revisiting budget and burn projections. I’m not suggesting everyone should run for the hills and go in cockroach mode – some emerging leaders will want to remain aggressive in conquering their markets. But we’re certainly entering an era of tighter financial management, at a minimum.

The hardest question is whether startups should rush to the financing market now and get a round done before things get too bad. That’s highly case specific, and I’m not going to venture to provide a general answer to this here. But if you’re getting to 12 months of cash runway or less, it might make sense to do this sooner rather than later. At a minimum, financing processes are taking much longer than they did in the last couple of years.


A positive way to think about the current situation is that it is healthy and overdue evolution for the ecosystem. Ultimately, it’s not good for anyone, including very much founders, to be stretched to the extreme limits of expectations and be in a situation where over-performance becomes the base case.

Call me naively optimistic, but the current progressive slowdown of valuations, pace, round sizes, etc is an incredibly healthy and long overdue evolution for our startup/venture ecosystem (as long as it doesn’t turn into a severe correction for several years).

— Matt Turck (@mattturck) March 15, 2022

It’s also healthy for everyone to come back to a world where everyone has a bit more time to make thoughtful decisions. We had certainly hit a “greed on” phase and many in the ecosystem welcome a slowdown in pace, with due diligence frequently going out of the window.

First board meeting after the round is the new due diligence

— Matt Turck (@mattturck) October 8, 2021

A sustained VC pullback would have many downstream consequences.

One open question: a great aspect of the VC financing frenzy of the last few years is that investors (and founders) got increasingly experimental and willing to fund ventures in deep tech for example (really cool companies in space tech, synthetic bio, energy etc), and also in non-traditional geographies. Just like emerging neighborhoods get hit first when the housing market turns, will those be disproportionally affected?

Yeah maybe the VC market is crazy and it will end badly, but in the meantime a lot of that cash is going into building some really cool shit

— Matt Turck (@mattturck) April 27, 2021

Another potential open question: as VC financing becomes harder to get, will the number and quality of startups decrease? Encouraged by a frothy environment, many in recent years left their high-paying jobs in big tech companies to start their own ventures (one example being the many engineers who started open source projects at places like Airbnb, Facebook, LinkedIn and Neflix and left to start commercial companies based on those projects). This created a virtuous circle and a very exciting flow of top quality founders companies. Will it now turn into a vicious circle?

It is well known that some of the best startups are created in down cycles, but it takes an extra special founder to want to venture out in a difficult environment.

One final open question: what does this mean for the venture capital industry? Certainly VC had experienced unprecedented levels of evolution (or disruption) over the last couple of years – crossover funds, mega-funds, solo GPs, emerging DAOs in crypto. What happens to all of this, over the next few years?

My general sense is that we will see some level of reversion back to the original model. This tweet is a bit strongly worded but directionally what I mean:

Unpopular opinion: the future of VC is… more or less the historical model of VC

* crossover investors will move on

* solo GPs will become regular firms or disappear

* web3 VCs will look suspiciously like regular VCs

Lindy effect of current model is strong

— Matt Turck (@mattturck) March 31, 2022
Regardless, in a tougher environment, VCs will need to step up their game and play the “classic” role of being hands-on and deeply involved in the companies they invest in.

Oddly contrarian thought: yes venture capital has evolved a lot lately, but there’s a stronger need than ever for the “classic” model of VC where one invests early, becomes the partner of record for years on end, takes responsibility and does the board work.

— Matt Turck (@mattturck) March 12, 2022

I’m as bullish as ever on the gigantic opportunity ahead for startups. I also very much hope this post does not age well, and looks silly in a year from now, as the market came back roaring. But if the current situation were to keep going or get worse, we’re going to collectively have to learn to navigate different times.

Read More
Share this on to discuss with people on this topicSign up on now if you’re not registered yet.

Related Articles

Create your crypto business with Stripe

The crypto ecosystem and its regulatory outlook continue to evolve rapidly, and our feature availability varies by region and use case. Please see our crypto supportability page for more details on our current product availability. Fill out the form to tell us more about what you’re building so we can better understand how to support…

Disaster Planning for Regular Folks

Written by, Dec 2015, minor updates Jul 2021. Twitter: @lcamtuf. Buy the book! Practical Doomsday is an in-depth, data-packed guide to rational emergency preparedness. Compared to the original content hosted on this page, the book strikes a far more mature tone, and provides much deeper insights on many key topics. For example, it dedicates…

The Edited Latecomer’s Recordsdata to Crypto

Annotations by Molly White, Matt Binder, Grady Booch, Amy Castor, Stephen Diehl, Dirty Bubble Media, Dr. Catherine Flick, David Gerard, Geoffrey Huntley, Bennett Tomlin, Neil Turkewitz, Ed Zitron, and some anonymous contributors. Published March 25, 2022. On March 20, 2022, the New York Times published a 14,000-word puff piece on cryptocurrencies, both online and as…

What is money, anyway?

Published: March 2022 Money is a surprisingly complex subject. People spend their lives seeking money, and in some ways it seems so straightforward, and yet what humanity has defined as money has changed significantly over the centuries. How could something so simple and so universal, take so many different forms? Source of Icons: Flaticon It’s…


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *