it’s laborious to recollect these names
For years after I speed into actual tools or companies, I save them for later. There’re several complications with this come:
- They’re scattered in browser bookmarks, github stars, and random tweets.
- It’s laborious to search out the particular one after I want one thing I vagualy bear in mind marked. I steadily forget the name of the product. So I hold to query by alternate and form.
- Some of them are no longer on hand anymore.
I want to hold a tiny machine to present me answers to questions like:
- Ah what’s that self-hostable provider to deal with webhooks with legit ruby sdk that someone talked about weeks ago?
- Ouch this public api will not be any longer working anymore I judge there’s yet one more identical one?
- Hello what did we spend to scheme diagrams for our closing 365 days’s keynote? You know the one with traces, arrows, uh, traces? No?
details to query
I outlined several dimensions faded to search out the particular tools:
- form (utility, provider, api, etc.)
- tags (suit for all the pieces like alternate, aspects)
- self-hostable
- viewers (developer, vogue designer, pupil, etc.)
- officially supported languages
I don’t desire to make spend of belief, but it works
So I moved my bookmarks into a database on belief and shared it to the online. I’m stilling engaged on enriching the tips and adding my marked/stared projects on assorted platforms.
I modified into as soon as reluctant to make spend of belief basically because:
- It’s proprietary and requires an fable to edit.
- The belief’s database is correct a wrapper around its block machine, and a myth is correct a page block with several more properties. There’s no actual cell and you will’t touch upon or monitor a particular cell.
- The history/permission systems are neatly-liked level. There’d be no solution to avoid losing out an edit war.
Nonetheless to be correct, belief is silent the most practical possible plot I’ve stumbled on to allotment a bunch of structured details while enabling others to edit and question.
It impress me much less than 30 minuts to allotment the database, config one customized domain, and setup a actual domain (🧰 1-toolbox.com) forwarding to the page.
My assorted selections are:
wikimedia
It’d be a actual wiki, open and anonymously editable. Nonetheless wikimedia’s machine is constructed around articles, no longer structured records.
Surely there’s wikidata. I’m no longer an skilled but I judge wikidata also spend wikimedia, and the tips are correct wrapped articles. I don’t know php and don’t desire to spend time on hacking it. Nonetheless, I impact judge it’s an promising machine and would spend some time to experiment with it.
google sheet
A public shared google sheet can even solve this. I tested it, and it’s bloated and unhurried. Plus, a google fable is vital, so there’s. The comment machine is higher, but I don’t judge it’s possible to form assorted views (set up of filters) without heavy hacking.
the tips are straightforward but laborious
The questions about abusing/censoring were exploding in my thoughts. So I made up my thoughts to forget all of them and let it speed wild for some time.
I set up the edit permission to every person, added some straightforward tips and am hoping for one of the dear straightforward.
- don’t destruct
- don’t mass delete or insert corrupt teach
- don’t poison
- don’t insert malicious links or links with reference code/tracker
- don’t reap
- don’t edit/comment in return for cash or identical inducements, or delete your competitor
- don’t brawl
- don’t open, be part of, or escalate an edit war
- don’t promote
- impact give major contribution sooner than self-promote
suggestions welcome
Thanks for studying. When you happen to search out
🧰 1-toolbox.com
actual. Please support allotment it and likely update the tips as you test out match, lastly all of us can hold an even bigger toolbox.