Primer: Statistical [Tank] Armour

Bar. Cage. Slat. Mesh. Net. Chain. It has many names, but all belong to a family of armour – statistical armours. Designed to defeat RPGs, it has become a normal sight on every class of vehicle from logistics trucks to main battle tanks. But how does it actually work, and why do you almost certainly…

Primer: Statistical [Tank] Armour

Here’s one other unheard of merchandise.

Bar. Cage. Slat. Mesh. Bag. Chain. It has many names, nevertheless all belong to a household of armour – statistical armours. Designed to defeat RPGs, it has became a odd peep on every class of automobile from logistics trucks to main fight tanks. However how does it in actual fact work, and why enact you in all likelihood specialize in it does some issues it doesn’t?

A quintessential image of statistical armour, superior to a British Mastiff

What’s it?

Because the establish suggests, statistical armour is designed to defeat its aim threats by employ of statistical likelihood. Where faded armour seeks to accurate duvet a automobile in safety from any axis, statistical armour performs a numbers sport to offer upright (the total lot is relative) ranges of safety while preserving weight and quantity down and visibility up.

Let’s web this one out the vogue up entrance and centre:

Statistical armour is exclusively for defeat of fashioned price munitions using a double-skinned nose as conductive route for a piezoelectric-primarily primarily based fuzing machine.

That refers mainly to the RPG household, including systems in the RPG-7/PG-9/PG-15/SPG-9 households. Why possess I written that in a patronisingly courageous stand out manner? Since the pervasive misunderstanding of statistical armour is what it’ll and can also’t enact, and why it exists. Even mavens in the self-discipline of AFVs, weapons and armour typically relieve a inaccurate determining of what this armour does.

First, how does it work?

To know how statistical armour works you first desire a fundamental overview of how the possibility it is looking to defeat works. Below is a marketing consultant draw of the inappropriate portion of a odd RPG. The explosive price is the (6) yellow subject fabric, which would possibly perchance detonate and manufacture a fashioned price jet from the (4) liner subject fabric forming a cone in entrance of it. The outlet subject to the entrance of the RPG is accurate empty subject wished to allow the weapon to provoke at a standoff from the aim.

When the (1) nose of the RPG hits a aim, it crushes piezoelectric crystals which manufacture an electrical present that is transmitted to the fuze on the rear of the warhead by strategy of (2) an internal ‘pores and skin’, main to detonation of the price. Statistical armour targets this mechanism of motion.

Going abet to our statistical armour, it forms a gargantuan grid, the keep a majority of it is in actual fact open subject, with inflexible choices dividing it into up. This draw we now possess a statistical likelihood that if an RPG is fired on the grid, its nose will war via a area of interest slightly than hit something. The grid has been designed at such dimensions that it is a little bit of smaller than the anticipated warhead (usually 65-95 mm for something admire a PG-7) and which potential that after the mute tip has passed with out incident, the foremost body of the warhead collides with the grid and is deformed, making the outer and internal skins of the RPG contact every other internally.

Demonstration of the supreme supposed defeat mechanism of statistical armour

This has now immediate circuited the fuzing machine, even if the tip does now affect something and send an electrical price, that is no longer going to realize the fuze on the rear and the price can no longer detonate.

Given the velocities fervent the warhead is more typically than no longer severely broken, breaking it aside and destroying it, or catching it in the grid with out impacting the car itself. We’re facing explosives, so while a detonation can no longer happen and thus a fashioned price jet can no longer be fashioned, the price can deflagrate or burn (peek my primer on Insensitive Munitions (IM) for some more ingredient on the hundreds of grades of filled with life reaction) and so a defeat is no longer always with out some fanfare, nevertheless the foremost mechanism of assault by strategy of fashioned price jet has been thwarted.

Shrimp by shrimp of an RPG being defeated by bar armour..

Even in an supreme defeat the keep the RPG sticks in the bars and by no draw impacts the hull of the car at all, a level of fragmentation and debris will nonetheless challenge from the RPG onto the car. In a suboptimal defeat there’ll likely be deflagration with accompanying fragmentation. Despite the total lot the car being defended by statistical armour needs some manufacture of passive ballistic armour to give protection to it from the consequences of the defeat mechanism, and ‘no enact’ is an that can by no draw be recorded in a defeat scenario.

A secondary possibility is that in the event of a defeat there is known as a grenade trapped on the side of the car that must be removed, despite the truth that more typically than no longer the warhead breaks up sufficiently from interaction with the bars/mesh to render the possibility rather low.

A a success bar armour intercept, capturing the round and stopping jet formation

How efficient is it?

Perchance surprisingly ineffective, in actual fact. The topic stems from the truth that the RPG must pass via a area of interest and possess the side of its warhead strike a inflexible ingredient sufficiently to assert off a immediate in the fuzing circuit. RPGs advance in a unfold of sizes and kinds, and the grid can totally be designed in a single dimension.

If the RPG impacts too end to a grid ingredient this is in a position to maybe provoke the price and manufacture a fashioned price jet as supposed (peek Issues other folks typically web negative for more on this in a little bit of). If it hits too completely in the centre (and is of the actual dimensions), it’ll also simply no longer be sufficiently broken by the surrounding grid to neutralise it sooner than the price is introduced about.

Polish experimental files exhibiting the areas the keep a mesh configuration is efficient in defeating an RPD.

So the designers want to construct the grid geometry slightly fastidiously to maximise defeat in opposition to the supposed possibility projectile. However this totally works in a mathematically finest scenario – a perpendicular engagement. In actual fact, RPGs advance at you from all elevations and azimuths. And because the technique perspective is tilted laterally or vertically the efficient form of the aperture that the RPG is being presented changes too, turning into smaller and thus more at possibility of encounter an affect on the grid slightly than passing via it.

Hide how hundreds of the efficient apertures of the bar armour are across the hundreds of sides of this automobile.

So that it is probably going you’ll maybe maybe maybe open up the geometry to present better odds of an intercept at off-axis attacks, nevertheless then you positively accurate made the apertures bigger when the possibility does advance on-axis, and so it is now more likely those will fail to be neutralised. As with every AFV engineering, it is a case of exchange-offs, modelling and creating the defence in opposition to the in all likelihood possibility, with mitigation or acceptance of the inherent drawbacks that you just have got taken in change.

Efficacy of mesh armour in opposition to a unfold of possibility warheads as azimuth and elevation change.

So, announcing how upright statistical armour is typically terms can also furthermore be something of a transferring aim. Against which RPG model? At what elevation and azimuth of assault? With what armour geometry?

A marketing consultant instance is the below chart taken from a Polish see into mesh armour. The foremost takeaway is that in the supreme situation – 0° elevation/azimuth, perpendicular ‘on-axis’ assault with a manufacture of mesh successfully aligned with the possibility projectile dimensions – the likelihood maxed out at 42% likelihood of intercept, dropping to c.10% by a 40° assault axis, and then 0% by 45°. Because the charts above articulate, statistical armour is more mute to elevation than it is azimuth usually, nevertheless suffers in spite of the total lot.

Issues other folks typically web negative.

There would possibly perchance be one serious fable that is most routinely repeated about statistical armour, which is that its intent is to provoke an RPG on the armour and thus ‘nullify the fashioned price jet sooner than it’ll attain the car’. Here’s fully negative, despite how in vogue its perception is. So pervasive is this fable, it even vegetation up in knowledgeable engineering oriented documentation, such as the UK Defence Long-established 23-10 Construct Pointers for Ministry of Defence Specialist Vehicles and Plant Instruments which, despite being fully negative, says:

“Stand off armour or cage armour is designed to stand as a lot as an assault from anti-tank rocket propelled grenades (RPG). It choices by placing a inflexible barrier across the car which causes the fashioned price warhead, which uses a fashioned explosion slightly than kinetic vitality, to explode at a rather helpful distance. “
Defence Long-established 23-10

As defined earlier, the convey strategy of defeat for statistical armour is to allow an RPG to pass via the holes in the grid and then wound the constructing of the warhead, severely negative its characteristic as a fuze factor. The intent of the armour is no longer, in any potential, to present a spaced armour layer that initiates an RPG at a distance from the defended automobile.

The truth of this fable is admittedly more indispensable – detonating the warhead on the bars can also furthermore be a minimal of as unsuitable as if it had hit the defended automobile and, in some cases, in actual fact a worse result for the defended automobile.

Formed price jet penetration is a successfully modelled relationship of standoff in cone/price diameters (CD) main to a depth of penetration furthermore measured in CD. The particular relationship can range (slightly very a lot) reckoning on liner geometry, the subject fabric of the liner itself, the composition manufacture of the price and a unfold of alternative factors.

An exemplar chart is confirmed below, the keep one would possibly perchance maybe maybe calculate that for a given warhead, shall we declare c.75 mm for a odd PG-7 sequence round, the penetration when at a in-constructed standoff of around 2 CD is in the plight of 350 mm. Hide that this chart is no longer exhibiting the PG-7 curve namely, the next numbers are accurate illustrative.

As always, issues have to no longer that easy. Because it is probably going you’ll maybe maybe also peek, the penetration varies considerably as standoff changes, with the totally penetration tending to be be in the 6 to 10 CD range. For a PG-7 that is a standoff of 450 mm to 750 mm, vastly more than can also furthermore be executed with the PG-7’s warhead’s constructed-in standoff of c.155 mm from nose to price.

With a little bit of of luck the enact is turning into evident – by impacting the statistical armour and detonating at that level, the armour has given the RPG a free c.300+ mm of free standoff extension, pushing from its inherent 2 CD standoff to something more 6 to 8 CD, and in flip upping penetration by a corpulent CD or more. The armour accurate amplified the possibility potential by a upright 20%, making lifestyles worse for you interior that automobile. The particular enact is heavily reliant on the convey CD standoff/penetration curve for the convey warhead manufacture in ask, nevertheless as a marketing consultant instance it is indicative of the subject at hand.

These figures were hypothetical, the PG-7 would no longer conform to this convey chart, nevertheless the principle endures – RPG projectiles no longer regularly possess supreme constructed-in standoff in negate in self belief to steer clear of shapely and unwieldy rounds that is maybe onerous to lunge and address, and so detonation on statistical armour is in if truth be told all cases a modest enhancement to their potential as a possibility to you within the car.

In the rare cases the keep it is a degradation, shall we declare with very shapely and unwieldy projectiles admire the PG-7VR tandem warhead round, articulate that the penetration chart declines mighty more step by step than it rises – you’ve got got to web the round past 14 CD or more sooner than there is a tangible degradation in penetration, and that reflects on the subject of a metre of standoff, which when doubled to remember of this armour being on either side of a automobile would possess woeful implications to working such a automobile in the leisure nevertheless open nation.

There would possibly perchance be rarely such a thing as a motive a vogue designer would seek to enhance the standoff on this kind, and so it is a fable that that is the intent of the armour concept.

A temporary articulate that the subject fabric that the RPG price liner is constituted of has a indispensable affect on penetration. Newer and denser offers can radically amplify the CD penetration ratio. Most RPGs utilise a copper liner owing to a high density – 8,900 kg/m² vs 2,800 kg/m² when comparing copper to aluminium, one other liner possibility, both confirmed in the chart below.

Newer and heaps more dense offers admire molybdenum can extra amplify penetration by 10% to 20% over copper.

A much less overall fable is that statistical armour is a continuation of the German Schürzen armour panels from the 1940s, primarily primarily based on a perception that these armour panels were developed primarily primarily based on Bazooka/PIAT-kind weapons proliferating via US and Commonwealth forces.

Schürzen panels are no longer linked to statistical armour.

That is no longer staunch both. Schürzen is no longer a statistical armour nevertheless a spaced armour designed primarily primarily based on Soviet anti-tank rifles, no longer Allied HEAT weapons, which didn’t even exist in any indispensable potential on the time that Schürzen became first fielded. Given the US and UK didn’t self-discipline shapely calibre anti-tank rifles admire the Soviets, it is probably going they simply erroneously linked the armour to their very possess nascent AT weapons and this caught as a narrative.

So, the keep enact ATGM advance into all of this?

Smartly, they set no longer. At the same time as they’d maybe feasibly undergo wound and destruction forward of affect, in on the subject of all cases ATGM are of a vastly bigger dimension than an RPG – shall we declare 152 mm price diameter for a 9M133 Kornet vs 93 mm for a PG-7VL.

They enact no longer employ the piezoelectric fusing concept of an RPG, and so destruction of the nose is no longer going to assert off a immediate and thus defeat the weapon. Most ATGM utilise one or more of RF proximity and affect fuzing, so the overwhelming chances are high that they detonate on or at a standoff forward of reaching the statistical armour. As successfully as, a upright fragment of ATGM designs utilise prime assault profiles, negating statistical armour fully.

Forward attacking modern ATGM designs mount the warhead slightly some distance abet on the missile, such as in the MBDA MMP draw above, in shapely phase to optimise standoff. This does imply that detonating on or sooner than the statistical armour array is at possibility of be detrimental to penetration, then again ATGM boast radically elevated penetration capabilities than an RPG owing to their mighty bigger dimensions and that most designs are tandem warheads with precursor prices almost as shapely as most RPG main warheads.

This penetration can also furthermore be gargantuan, in draw over 1,200 mm of RHA armour in essentially the newest guises, and so radically overmatches almost the leisure this is in a position to maybe bump into by manner of statistical armour programs, which would possibly perchance be usually placed on the perimeters and rear of vehicles the keep the armour is thinnest.

When it comes to modern ATGM the answer is to live the hit in the foremost draw by strategy of subtle and hard execute filled with life safety systems, signature management and other maintaining applied sciences, no longer to utilise statistical armour which is fully unsuited to the possibility. The answer is highly mighty in the outer layers of the survivability onion forward of an affect going down. If an ATGM is going to hit, it’ll enact some very severe wound.

Drawbacks of statistical armour.

The foremost drawbacks, rather restricted efficacy aside, are the scale and weight of a corpulent automobile package of this armour kind.

Something admire an M1126 Infantry Carrier Automobile (ICV) variant of the Stryker gains around 2.5 tonnes when it adds a corpulent bar armour package, which is set 15% amplify in GVW (a temporary acknowledgement of how light a Stryker is compared to the up-to-the-minute carve of 8x8s admire Boxer which sits across the 38 tonne worth, over two instances heavier).

Frequent steel bar armour is the heaviest of the statistical armour kinds, this is in a position to maybe maybe also be reduced by as a lot as 90% by using lighter manufacture kinds admire mesh armour, albeit with potential implications to performance as talked about earlier. All the pieces is a exchange-off with engineering and manufacture.

Size is the opposite main subject. no matter kind, statistical armour usually sits at a standoff of around n mm by mounting it on brackets that challenge from the hull. Because it is on either side, the enact on automobile dimensions is doubled – an additional 600 mm amplify or more in overall width and length.

The implications of developing your automobile wider can also furthermore be modelled and mapped onto supposed areas of operation.

This has indispensable affect on logistics, as loading limits on street/rail/sea/air transporters are very restricted, and can also no longer regularly accommodate such a shapely amplify. This draw the vehicles want to be torn down and refitted with armour sooner than/after transport, and the armour programs want to be transported besides to the vehicles.

It furthermore has impacts on the tactical employ of the vehicles. AFV are no longer small as-is, and are inviting to operate in complex terrain such as woodland or city environments. Together with signficiant projections across the car extra hampers peep traces for the motive force and crew, and makes the vehicles even tougher to manoeuvre with out placing boundaries.

There are answers to mitigate these issues. AmSafe Bridport’s Tarian mesh armour is lighter and lower profile than less complicated bar armour, and can also furthermore be mounted on folding brackets. The brackets fall down when fouled, stopping the armour panels from being ripped off or causing excessive wound to the fouled object, and can also furthermore be immediate folded flat in opposition to the car for transport slightly than having to unbolt and lift away the total lot.

Bar armour furthermore has human component implications to suit it. The UK Mastiff version of the US Cougar 6×6 doesn’t possess doorways for driver/passenger on the entrance admire the US version does as passive and bar armour programs block them fully, the crew want to scamper in (and out) from the rear door.

At the same time because it is probably going you’ll maybe maybe also hinge bar armour panels, they possibility fouling or live corpulent lunge of hatches and doorways owing to their enormous dimension and the standoff brackets. Bar armour arrays on the perimeters and rear of tank turrets will block engine bay web admission to and want to be removed to allow easy upkeep duties to happen.

This T-72B3M has intensive bar armour blocking web admission to to the engine deck and operating tools as a secondary affect of its fitting.

The implications of fitting a statistical armour package usually is a unfold of blind spots, fouled weapon and optics arcs and tense implications for ingress/egress of personnel and web admission to to key areas of the car.

Statistical armour kinds.

There are three wide forms of statistical armour. They’re all doing the identical component described above, accurate in subtly hundreds of ways and with hundreds of mavens and cons linked.

Bar armour

The first are essentially the most overall, known as bar armour (a more British timeframe) or cage/slat armour (a more American timeframe), they are gargantuan inflexible steel assemblies that encounter a such as a steel railing or cage on the zoo.

A British Challenger 2 mounting an intensive bar armour package on the rear of the hull and turret.

They’re the heaviest statistical armour kind by some margin and truly full, nevertheless furthermore specialize in essentially the most fundamental and uncomplicated implementation of the concept that. Being constituted of steel (despite the truth that aluminium-primarily primarily based examples are regularly outdated too), they’ll also furthermore be gash abet and welded in the self-discipline to repair incidental and combat wound.

Mesh armour

Mesh and obtain armour are, as the names suggests, a more mesh obtain or chain-hyperlink fence-admire constructing and typically lighter, more flexible and much less vision blocking than their more inflexible cousins.

A Polish Rosomak 8×8 carrying ‘mesh armour’ panels on the perimeters and rear of the hull.

The mesh usually is a steel core with fabric or polymer coating on it, and a few designs employ a inflexible block that is bonded onto every joint of the fence subject fabric to originate obvious strength when hit with the indispensable forces of an RPG, and to present some more enormous choices to help in breaking apart projectiles as they collide with the mesh.

Chain armour

Chain armour is maybe essentially the most simplistic of the household, with literal chains placing in a curtain association, usually with some more or much less heavy ball on the end to relieve some level of stress to the chains.

You do no longer peek this configuration all that typically, with the foremost instance being the underside of the bustle of the Israeli Merkava turret. The revenue is that it is extraordinarily flexible and so can readily brush in opposition to boundaries and the car itself with out incident, the keep bar or mesh is at possibility of be broken. Its efficacy, then again, is no longer the identical as the more consistently designed variations above, mirrored in its restricted utilisation.

House grown armours

A final neighborhood are the fully home made examples which would possibly perchance be more and more viewed across the realm, with Syria having been an especially bounteous source of examples. On the final they’ve outdated the bar armour technique, despite the truth that the manufacture of the grid itself appears to be like to be more primarily primarily based on what took place to be lying around than a deliberate manufacture replacement.

One component of those designs that can also furthermore be very indispensable is that the customers tend to maintain the subject in the abet of the bar armour with actual subject fabric – rocks or sand baggage – in the inaccurate perception that is providing some extra physical safety. In actual fact, that is blocking the gaps in the grid and which draw a vastly elevated likelihood that the nose will affect this subject fabric sooner than the warhead is deformed by the grid, and thus the price will detonate.

With fashioned price jets slightly unimpeded by sandbags or rocks of the scale fervent, these configurations enact shrimp to limit the enact of the weapon and, as talked about earlier, can also simply in actual fact be making it worse for the defended automobile by bettering the optimal standoff stipulations and reducing the percentages of a a success intercept.

In conclusion.

Is bar armour price it? It depends, nevertheless broadly yes, it is cheap, easy, and adds a layer of elevated safety in opposition to a overall and widely proliferated possibility that would possibly perchance maybe maybe in every other case be very at possibility of enact indispensable wound to a automobile, notably lighter courses of automobile admire protected patrol and utility vehicles (MRAPs in extinct money) which would possibly perchance be vastly overmatched by the possibility.

Are they an assured defeat mechanism – fully no longer, the truth is that they’re rather low likelihood of defeat and even then totally in supreme engagement geometries. And, whilst you lift nothing else from this shrimp primer, possess in mind the truth of the supreme fable of this armour – it is no longer in any manner intended to detonate an RPG at a standoff from the car!

Disclaimer: These primers are supposed to be immediate and candy, and truly introductory. There are nuances and depth to the staunch engineering image that can peek convey exceptions to suggestions and pedantry (which I fully approve of) will likely be ready to accumulate holes in the explanations. However as a immediate, tough and fascinating abstract of the tech, it with any luck does the job. Whenever you happen to admire to possess the corpulent depth on statistical armour there are a legion of books and papers on the market to dig into the specificities, many in the final public area.

Read More
Half this on to check with other folks on this topicRegister on now whilst you are no longer registered but.



“Simplicity, patience, compassion.
These three are your greatest treasures.
Simple in actions and thoughts, you return to the source of being.
Patient with both friends and enemies,
you accord with the way things are.
Compassionate toward yourself,
you reconcile all beings in the world.”
― Lao Tzu, Tao Te ChingBio: About: